
|
 |
Overqualified or Over Stated??? by Michael O'Sullivan |
A tongue in cheek look at our profession
The plethora of qualifications and designatory letters after
many a hypnotherapists name can be a cause of some confusion
to members of the public and indeed, other healthcare
professionals. Even should the reader know what the various
letters mean, in some cases they may not mean what they
imply! Some highly qualified therapists simply get by with
their Dip Hyp and leave it at that.
For example, how many hypnotherapists are now called Doctor
by virtue of a PHD? And is it a genuine PHD or a case of
Pile it Higher and Deeper?
I recently read that a complaint had been laid against a
spiritualist that they were misleading people by using an
inappropriate qualification, a PhD of questionable origin.
The complainant argued their case that this was misleading
because it gave the impression that the advertiser was more
qualified than they actually were. Give them their dues, the
advertiser wrote a letter for publication to apologise and
explained their part of the story. The argument was settled
amicably and the qualification was not to be used in any
future advertising. In our own profession we've seen some
people embarrassed when their claimed PhDs were traced back
to spurious organisations. What kind of organisations are we
talking about here? Well, according to my email inbox today
I myself have today personally qualified for several
University degrees (unspecified), two PhDs and a doctorate
in divinity. Of course as I've lived for so long, have had
so many life experiences, am able to read my email and
therefore presumably able to send payment, I 'qualify'!!!
These qualifications would sound impressive to someone who
didn't know where they originated. But would they be
relevant or even an honest representation of qualifications
I've actually earned?
In the spring of 2005 I was in communication with a
colleague, who, told me that his title was now Doctor, and
could I amend my records accordingly? Being the inquisitive
type, I did some research and found that although my
colleague may well be entitled to the title by virtue of the
PhD that he had 'earned', the source of the PhD did not
inspire confidence. A 'University' that awards degrees and
PhDs for 'life experience' of the kind that spam offers
around the Internet ad infinitum, and whose emails I delete
on a daily basis is not a source that is credible to me or
to most people.
Otherwise know as diploma mills, these 'Universities' sole
criteria for awarding any of their qualifications is that
the recipient be alive and capable of paying for it.
In short, it is the kind of PhD that anyone can acquire as
long as the fees can be paid. Should the public consider
that these kinds of qualifications are confidence inspiring
and mean superior knowledge?
Well, they don't inspire me in the slightest, and having
been involved in this field for a fair number of years I do
believe that I know what I'm talking about. Maybe it's a sad
reflection on market forces. A hypnotherapist sees the
competition across the road now has seventeen sets of
initials after his name. Where can I find another three to
get ahead again???
I'll have to start printing my letterhead in landscape
format to get them all on!!!"
In comparison a dear friend of mine has just been granted
her PhD - after 4 years of hard study and a year writing a
thesis which was then presented before the rigorous scrutiny
of a board of examiners.
To most people a PhD after a person's name usually means
something and speaks for itself. A PhD from Oxford or
Cambridge can't be compared to one from a degree mill.
So are we asking the right question? Might it not be better
to ask 'what kind of person has the qualifications?' rather
that 'what qualifications does the person have?' What good
is it to a client if an expensively and well qualified
therapists is also inept and obtains poor results?
In the same street you may find a very competent but on the
face of it, poorly qualified therapist who through
personality, life and personal experience and knowledge is
probably the best person in the world to help someone with
their particular problem.
So, how far do we want to go? - In the early days everyone
had their Dip Hyp and went about their business quite
happily. Today we have master hypnotists, advanced
hypnotherapists, reverends and now a whole profusion of PhDs
and so many more 'job titles' its hard to keep up!
Where will it all end?
Note: Not all degree programs are offered by
traditional universities. There are a number of excellent
non-traditional universities offering flexible learning
paths to a degree. The validity of the degree obtained in
this way will depend on the reputation of the awarding body.
The non-traditional degree route can be very worthwhile as
its much more flexible than through a traditional
university, and can offer degrees in subjects not otherwise
available. Non-traditional universities should not be
confused with degree mills!
Copyright Michael O'Sullivan 2009 - all
rights reserved
www.health-concern.com
Amended version previously published in Fidelity, the
Journal of The National Council for Psychotherapists (Spring
2006 Edition)
|
 |
General Interest >> Case Histories >> Professional
Interest >>
Transpersonal
Therapy
>>
Short Articles
>>
Scripts >>
Book reviews
>>
Press Releases
>>
Miscellaneous Articles
Home Page
|
|
 |
|